ENERGY · WIND
Finding every suspect blade: failure containment for a wind-turbine OEM
When a blade defect appears in the field, the manufacturer must decide which blades to inspect. Inspecting everything from a plant is slow and costly; inspecting too few leaves defects in service. Wexa linked manufacturing, field service and customer contracts in one graph and let an agent find the exact cohort.
- inspections needed (graph cohort vs PLM-only)
- recall: no defective blade left in service
- less inspection cost at an assumed $1.1M per blade
- node and relationship types across 3 systems
- CLIENT
- Global wind-turbine manufacturer
- REGION
- Global
- WHEN
- 2026
- ENGAGEMENT
- Solution build
- WEXA COMPONENTS
- Wexa · custom ontology · context graph · cohort agent
01Case 13
The challenge
- Defects travel through adhesive lots, plant transfers and people, not just through one plant
- PLM, field-service and CRM data live in separate systems
- Customer contracts carry tight serial-defect notice periods (as short as 48 hours)
What Wexa built
- Ontology spanning PLM (blades, adhesive lots, plants), field service (inspections, inspectors) and CRM (customers, contracts, notice terms)
- Cohort agent that walks provenance only and never reads the defect label
- Comparison against PLM-only and plant-sweep containment strategies
- Customer-notice view ranking affected contracts by notice deadline
02Case 13
How it runs on Wexa
03Case 13
Results
| Measure | Before / without Wexa | With Wexa |
|---|---|---|
Blades inspected per containment event | 24 blades | 6 blades |
Annual cost of the process | $26.4M | $6.6M |
Time to implement the AI solution | 6 months | 4 weeks |
AI build cost (one-time) | $480K | $30K |
AI operating cost per year (models, infrastructure, upkeep, platform) | $312K | $166K |
Total AI cost in year 1 | $792K | $195K |
With Wexa
net annual value to the client after Wexa's own operating cost
faster to implement
lower AI operating cost
less AI spend in year 1
- Validation test: the graph cohort needed 6 inspections and found every defective blade; PLM-only needed 24; a plant sweep needed 18 and missed 2
- The missed blades were reached only through an inter-plant adhesive-lot transfer and an inspector on secondment, relationships that exist only in the graph
More case studies
All 43 casesPharmaceuticals
Regulatory variation management · global pharma
17
impacted objects found across 4 hops
One safety-committee line item traced to 17 impacted objects in 4 hops; 6 human signature gates, 0 autonomous executions
Read the caseIT service management
AI service desk · enterprise IT
5.5 s
self-service answer citing past incidents
Answers in 5.5 s, escalations in 4.5 s; go-live in 9.4 s; built entirely on Wexa
Read the caseAerospace and defense
Supplier recovery cockpit · aerospace OEM
1 hop
BOM where-used traversal in the context graph
Late POs ranked by downstream program revenue; every supplier message human-approved and audited
Read the caseWant results like these?
Book a 30-minute call and we will map your workflow to this case.