INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION
Root cause and approved fixes for failed automations
When bots fail, teams sift through job logs, change records, incidents and runbooks to find out why. Wexa reads all of them, names the root cause with evidence, proposes one corrective action and hands it back to the automation platform after a second person approves.
- automations and 18,120 jobs in scope
- failed jobs traced to a single field rename
- pieces of evidence behind the root cause
- approval: requester can never approve
- CLIENT
- Enterprise automation centre of excellence, with a leading RPA vendor
- REGION
- Global
- WHEN
- 2026
- ENGAGEMENT
- Partner build
- WEXA COMPONENTS
- Wexa · context graph · knowledge base · 4-agent process flow · four-eyes approval · A2A hand-off
01Case 22
The challenge
- A single application change silently breaks many bots
- Evidence spread across logs, changes, incidents and runbooks
- Fixes applied without review
What Wexa built
- Four agents in one flow: failure triage, change correlator, incident matcher, root-cause analyst
- Graph of applications, automations, jobs, failures, changes and incidents; runbooks and postmortems in the knowledge base
- One proposed corrective action, held for an approver above the requester
- Approved action handed to the automation platform; the outcome recorded as a new incident and postmortem for next time
02Case 22
How it runs on Wexa
03Case 22
Results
| Measure | Before / without Wexa | With Wexa |
|---|---|---|
Hours to triage each failed automation (~6,000 failures a year) | 3 hours | 0.5 hours |
Annual cost of the process | $1.1M | $180K |
Time to implement the AI solution | 6 months | 2 weeks |
AI build cost (one-time) | $480K | $15K |
AI operating cost per year (models, infrastructure, upkeep, platform) | $312K | $166K |
Total AI cost in year 1 | $792K | $180K |
With Wexa
net annual value to the client after Wexa's own operating cost
faster to implement
lower AI operating cost
less AI spend in year 1
- Deployed as a working application; investigation flow starts in about 1.1 s
More case studies
All 43 casesConsulting · energy and mining
Process architecture workbench · global consultancy
30
functional requirements specified and built
Technology partnership; client asked to deploy the asset for a 6–8 week engagement
Read the caseAnalytics and BI
Governed metrics · BI platform
386 / 604
graph nodes / edges from 6 tables and 353 rows
Data model synced to 386 nodes and 604 edges; metric corrections approved by owners, with rollback
Read the caseEnterprise software · ITSM
72-hour ITSM build · workflow platform
< 1 hour
to build a custom connector and ingest all records
Custom connector in under an hour; context sync every 5 minutes; incident resolved by agent
Read the caseWant results like these?
Book a 30-minute call and we will map your workflow to this case.